Loading
Comparison · dataset August 2026

Administrative Assistant vs Court Reporter: which is more exposed to AI?

Effectively tied: 2 points separate Administrative Assistants from Court Reporters.

Administrative Assistant scores 84% time-weighted AI exposure and Court Reporter scores 82% — close enough that the headline number tells you almost nothing. The difference lives underneath it: Administrative Assistants lose the most ground on "schedule meetings and manage calendars" (91%), while for Court Reporters it is "transcribe proceedings verbatim" (90%). The two sit in different families — Office & Administrative and Legal — so any move between them is a career change, not a lateral step.

2PP GAP

Seven dimensions, side by side.

METRICADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTCOURT REPORTERDELTA
AI exposure84%82%2pp gap
Resilience score34/10032/1002pt gap
Substitutable work time56%56%Fully automatable today
Human-critical work time22%16%Models score poorly here
Median salary$46k$63k$17k apart
10-year growth-8%-5%Court Reporter
US workforce2.9M27kBLS OEWS
Task level

What actually creates the gap.

Both roles hand a similar slice of the week to substitutable work — 56% for Administrative Assistants, 56% for Court Reporters — but it is different work. Administrative Assistant exposure concentrates in "schedule meetings and manage calendars"; Court Reporter exposure concentrates in "transcribe proceedings verbatim". Two roles can share a score and face completely different disruption timelines.

Administrative Assistant
MOST EXPOSED TASKS
  • Schedule meetings and manage calendars91% · 18% time
  • Draft emails, memos, and documents88% · 16% time
  • Prepare meeting notes and summaries86% · 10% time
  • Organize files and maintain records84% · 12% time
HUMAN-CRITICAL CORE
  • Handle confidential judgment calls14% · 4% time
  • Support executives and teams in person18% · 8% time
  • Screen sensitive calls and visitors24% · 10% time
Court Reporter
MOST EXPOSED TASKS
  • Transcribe proceedings verbatim90% · 22% time
  • Format and proof transcripts86% · 12% time
  • Produce certified transcripts82% · 14% time
  • Caption hearings in realtime78% · 8% time
HUMAN-CRITICAL CORE
  • Maintain courtroom decorum role20% · 3% time
  • Safeguard record integrity22% · 3% time
  • Certify accuracy under oath25% · 6% time
What transfers

Both roles lean on procedural — that is the part of your experience that travels intact. The real divide is social: Administrative Assistants score 68 there against 30 for Court Reporters, a 38-point spread. That is the gap you would actually have to close.

DIMENSIONADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANTCOURT REPORTER
Social6830
Creative328
Manual1842
Switching between them
ModerateDIFFICULTY

Administrative Assistant appears in our dataset as a mapped adjacent career for Court Reporters: the move raises exposure by 2 points, landing at 84%. Switch difficulty reads moderate — capability profiles are 22 points apart on average.

Score your own exposure in 8 questions →

Common questions.

Is Administrative Assistant or Court Reporter more at risk from AI?

Administrative Assistant. It scores 84% time-weighted AI exposure against 82% for Court Reporter — a 2-point gap. 56% of administrative assistant work time is already fully substitutable by current models, versus 56% for Court Reporters.

Which pays more, Administrative Assistant or Court Reporter?

Court Reporter, by roughly $17k at the median ($63k versus $46k). Note that the higher-paying role here is also the less AI-exposed one, which matters if you are weighing pay against durability.

Can a administrative assistant switch to being a court reporter?

Administrative Assistant appears in our dataset as a mapped adjacent career for Court Reporters: the move raises exposure by 2 points, landing at 84%. Switch difficulty reads moderate — capability profiles are 22 points apart on average.

Which role is growing faster, Administrative Assistant or Court Reporter?

Court Reporter, at -5% projected ten-year growth versus -8% — a 3-point difference. Growth and AI exposure are separate signals: a role can grow in headcount while the content of the work is substantially rewritten.

Methodology
Scores are time-weighted across each role's canonical O*NET tasks, graded against current frontier-model capability. How we score.